A Close, Not a Wick: SkyAnalyst's S&P 500 Short After the Hot CPI
SkyAnalyst AI journal entry: US500 short on Oct 14, 2026 ran to +1.70R (TP2) full potential and closed +0.80R (TP1) realized. Full workspace view, decision log, and AI reasoning, unedited.
Before the trade, meet the system.
SkyAnalyst is not one AI trader. It is four specialist agents, each with its own data pipeline, each maintaining state between evaluations, and each required to agree before a position is sized. They don’t chat in prose. They write structured messages to a shared state object that each reads on every evaluation cycle. That’s what makes the system auditable, and it’s what this case study will show, step by step, on an S&P 500 short that waited fourteen minutes for a 5-minute close below its level.
The S&P 500 spent fourteen minutes on Wednesday morning inside the band where SkyAnalyst had said it would sell, and the system spent the same fourteen minutes declining to. Its 10:33 ET plan, written two hours after a hot CPI print, set one condition in plain words: a 5-minute candle had to close below 7,754 on rising volume, and "do not enter on a wick below that immediately reverses." Between 10:38 and 10:49 ET, six entry reads saw price trade into the 7,751-7,753 entry zone, as low as 7,752.4 at one read, and each one said wait because no candle had closed below the level. The seventh read, at 10:52 ET, found the close: the 10:45 ET candle had finished at 7,749.9, a tenth of a point under the 7,750 round number. It entered at a confidence of 62 and said in the same paragraph that the volume half of the trigger had not shown up. The order filled at 7,751.1 at 10:56 ET. TP1 at 7,736 printed 44 minutes later for +0.80R (TP1), or +$1,600 (TP1) on the simulated $100,000 account in the returns panel, and the broker closed the full position there, as it does on every trade. The market kept going to TP2 at 7,719 by 12:24 ET, a full-potential move of +1.70R (TP2). We picked this trade for the distinction it rests on. For most of a five-minute bar, a print below a level and a close below it look the same on a fast chart, and this plan treated only one of them as a signal. Our October 5 Cable short faced the same kind of trigger and sold on a close that missed by four tenths of a pip; this one waited for the real thing. If you want plans that define what counts before price arrives, see SkyAnalyst run your markets on a 21-day free trial.
A CPI morning that broke the range
September CPI landed at 8:30 ET above forecast on both measures that mattered for rates: core at 2.6% year over year against 2.5% expected, headline at 3.7% against 3.6%. Before the release the Macro Agent had rated the S&P 500 lean bull at 76 percent and named the risk itself: downside "if headline inflation surprises and forces yield repricing." By the time the setup analysis ran at 10:33 ET, the index had fallen about 70 points from pre-CPI highs near 7,833 to around 7,758.
The cross-asset readings at 10:33 ET all pointed the same way. The 10-year yield at 5.259 had pushed above the prior day's high of 5.236. VIX at 15.67 was above the prior day's range and up from a 15.28 close. NYAD breadth had collapsed from a +240 close to -1,625, far below the prior day's low of -516. The analysis called the breadth collapse "the strongest bearish confirmation available for SPX."
The Trend Agent moved first
The Trend Agent read the S&P bearish at 9:10 ET, at 65 percent, with a transitioning regime and a reduce-size recommendation, warning that "a reflex bounce is plausible before continuation." By 9:58 ET it had moved to 78 percent, strong trend, normal sizing, with invalidation at 7,799.2 and support at 7,753.7. Its note read: "Hotter-than-expected CPI and rising US yields are macro headwinds for equities, supporting the intraday bearish reversal despite the older macro agent reading still leaning bullish."
The read the plan set aside
The Macro Agent's 10:01 ET refresh kept the S&P at lean bull, 78 percent, while listing the bearish factors against it: NYAD at -1,655 against a 5-day EMA of -135.2, the 10-year at 5.295%, and October hike odds up to 43.7% from 22.1%. The 10:33 ET plan called that read stale by 32 minutes and wrote that it was "leaning fully with the Trend Agent but acknowledging the nominal disagreement by reducing conviction one notch from maximum." Rising yields under a stretched index were also the backdrop for our September 23 Nasdaq short, which sold a bounce with yields at 5.054% and RSI far more stretched than this.
Bear Flag Breakdown. This is a pattern professional traders use after a sharp, high-volume drop. Price stops falling and drifts sideways in a tight range, the flag, while momentum cools. The trade is to sell the break of the bottom of that range, on the view that the pause was a rest inside the trend rather than the end of it, and to keep the stop just above the top of the flag.
The flag and the trigger
On Wednesday the flag was a shelf between roughly 7,754 and 7,762, sitting on the session's New York low at 7,754.3 and just above the 7,750 round number. The plan asked for a 5-minute close below 7,754 with increasing volume, said a clean close below 7,753 would confirm, and ruled out wicks that broke the level and snapped back. The entry zone it set was 7,751-7,753.
The stop and the targets
The stop went to 7,770, two points above the consolidation high near 7,767.6 and well below the Trend Agent's 7,799.2 invalidation. The analysis admitted it was on the tight side for VIX at 15.67. TP1 at 7,736 sat near the 60-minute 2x ATR band. TP2 at 7,719 came from a measured move: the 38-point leg from 7,792 to 7,754, projected lower, points to about 7,716.
What it wrote down against itself
The plan scored the setup 7 out of 10 with five of six confluences, and listed its own risks: 60-minute RSI at 26.3 and 15-minute RSI at 23.2, price already more than 50 points under VWAP, declining volume on the latest candles, and a round number underneath that could act as a floor. It suggested trimming size to 0.75% of equity because the move was late. It considered a long and rejected it, finding "zero confluences for longs."
Same pattern, different market
The bear flag is a common continuation read on index futures after news. Last week's Nasdaq short sold a VWAP rejection that broke down the same way, from a different starting point.
SkyAnalyst doesn't favor any single strategy. Last week it bought a Dow retrace after a data release and sold a Nasdaq rejection; on Wednesday it sold a flag after an inflation surprise. The pattern comes from that morning's chart and calendar, and the conditions are written down before price gets there.
US500 (S&P 500): NY AM Session Analysis
Wed, Oct 14, 2026 | 10:33 AM ET
Market Environment Summary
The S&P 500 has suffered a decisive intraday reversal, plunging ~70 points from pre-CPI highs near 7833 to current levels around 7758. The catalyst is clear: hotter-than-expected CPI (Core CPI y/y 2.6% vs 2.5% forecast; CPI y/y 3.7% vs 3.6%) released at 8:30 AM ET, which immediately repriced rate expectations and triggered aggressive selling. This is confirmed across the macro landscape, US 10-year yields have surged above yesterday's high (5.259 vs yesterday's high of 5.236), VIX has broken above yesterday's high (15.67, rising from 15.28 close), and NYAD breadth has collapsed from a prior-day close of +240 to -1625 currently, well below yesterday's low of -516.
The macro backdrop is now contradictory: the Macro Agent still reads lean_bull (78% confidence), but this is stale by 32 minutes and was computed before the full CPI impact registered. The Trend Agent reads BEARISH (78% confidence, STRONG_TREND regime), which aligns with all live price action. This is a clear case where the Trend Agent takes precedence. The Macro Agent's bullish lean is now invalidated by the CPI shock, rising yields, rising VIX, and collapsing breadth are macro headwinds, not tailwinds.
Critical VIX divergence flag: VIX is rising (15.67, above yesterday's range) while SPX was falling, this is directionally consistent for shorts (VIX confirms risk-off). No reversal warning needed for the short side. However, VIX at 15.67 is in the normal 15-20 range, calling for 15-20pt stops.
Oil pulling back from highs (Brent 105.83 vs yesterday's 106.28) and gold holding elevated (4185) both confirm the risk-off rotation. DXY is slightly above yesterday's close (102.22 vs 102.18), mildly supportive of the dollar-up/equities-down narrative. No further high-impact USD events for ~22 hours (PPI/Retail Sales tomorrow 8:30 AM ET), so the window is clear for execution.
Directional Bias: Bearish Volatility: High (expanding, 60m ATR rising to 10.36, 5m ATR at 9.31; VIX above yesterday's range)
Step-by-Step Analysis
1. Breadth & Volatility Regime
| Indicator | Value | Signal |
|---|---|---|
| NYAD Current | -1,625 | Deeply negative, below yesterday's low (-516) |
| NYAD 5-day EMA | -129.2 | Deteriorating trend (from +300 → +240 → -200 → now -1625) |
| NYAD Range Today | -1,811 to -1,197 | Entire range negative, no recovery attempt |
| VIX Current | 15.67 | Above yesterday's high (15.61), rising |
| VIX vs Yesterday | +0.39 from close | Expanding, confirming risk-off |
Assessment: Breadth collapse is extreme and confirms the sell-off is broad-based, not sector-specific. This is the strongest bearish confirmation available for SPX, when NYAD collapses this hard, the index follows. VIX in the 15-20 normal band calls for 15-20pt stops. VIX rising with SPX falling = directionally aligned for shorts (no divergence warning).
2. Agent Synthesis
| Agent | Direction | Confidence | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trend Agent | BEARISH | 78% | Strong trend regime, bearish EMA cross on 60m, invalidation at 7799.2 |
| Macro Agent | lean_bull | 78% | STALE: 32min old, pre-CPI impact fully priced. Contradicted by live data |
Resolution: The agents technically disagree, but the Macro Agent's bullish reading is demonstrably obsolete. Live macro indicators (yields breaking out, VIX breaking out, breadth collapsing) have all flipped to support the bearish case. I am leaning fully with the Trend Agent but acknowledging the nominal disagreement by reducing conviction one notch from maximum. The Macro Agent itself noted "hotter CPI" as a catalyst, its own bias should update bearish once refreshed.
Risk events: All high-impact events today are past (CPI at 8:30 AM). Next events are PPI/Retail Sales tomorrow at 8:30 AM ET (~22h away). Window is clear.
3. Gap & Daily Structure
| Level | Price | Current Relationship |
|---|---|---|
| Yesterday's Close | 7808.9 | Price ~51 pts below (gap filled and broken) |
| Yesterday's High | 7817.3 | Broken and far above |
| Yesterday's Low | 7787.5 | Broken decisively: now resistance |
| 2-Day-Ago Close | 7814.8 | Far above |
| 3-Day-Ago Close | 7770.5 | Just broken below |
| Daily Pivot | 7804.6 | Far above, now major resistance |
| Today's Session Low | 7754.3 | Just above current price (~4 pts) |
| Round Number | 7750 | Immediate congestion zone below |
| Round Number | 7800 | Overhead resistance zone |
The open-to-now move represents roughly a -0.96% gap below yesterday's close equivalent (price traded above yesterday's high pre-CPI then crashed). This is a >0.5% move on high-impact news, the gap continuation rule applies: continuation favored over fill.
4. Multi-Timeframe Technicals
60-Minute (Bias Frame):
- EMA9 (7803.5) has crossed below EMA21 (7806.4) → bearish cross confirmed
- Price (7758) is ~45 pts below both EMAs → extended but trending
- RSI: 26.3 → oversold (caution for shorts, but in strong trends this can persist)
- MACD: -6.67, histogram -6.91 (strong negative) → confirms momentum
- VWAP (60m): 7804.5 → price ~46 pts below VWAP → deeply extended
- Volume: Spike detected on 12:00 and 13:00 UTC candles (8,586 and 10,138 vs 3,795 avg) → confirmed institutional selling
15-Minute (Confirmation Frame):
- All EMAs bearish (price well below EMA9 at 7790, EMA21 at 7805)
- RSI: 23.2 → deeply oversold, persistent
- MACD: -16.03, histogram -5.11 → strong negative, no sign of convergence
- VWAP: 7805.4 → price 47 pts below
- Volume: Elevated throughout the sell-off
5-Minute (Entry Precision Frame):
- Last 10 candles show a consolidation forming between 7754-7762 (range narrowing)
- EMA9 at 7772.6, EMA21 at 7790.8 → both declining, price well below
- RSI: ~32, not yet oversold on this TF but depressed
- MACD: -11.77, histogram flattening near -0.30 → momentum deceleration but no reversal
- VWAP (5m): 7805.9 → miles overhead
- NY Session range: Low 7754.3, High 7791.9
Key observation: Price is consolidating in a tight range (7754-7762) after the waterfall decline. This is a bear flag / continuation pattern: lower timeframe consolidation within a strong trend. The MACD histogram on 5m is flattening, suggesting the pause is temporary. A break below 7754 would confirm continuation.
5. Setup Filtering & Confluence Check
Short Setup Evaluation:
| Confluence | Met? | Details |
|---|---|---|
| (a) Multi-TF EMA alignment | ✅ | 60m, 15m, 5m all bearish, price below all EMAs on all frames |
| (b) Price on correct side of VWAP | ✅ | Below VWAP on all timeframes (~47 pts below) |
| (c) Prior day level interaction | ✅ | Broken below yesterday's low (7787.5), now trading below 3-day-ago close (7770.5) |
| (d) Both agents agree on direction | ⚠️ | Trend Agent bearish; Macro Agent nominally bullish but stale/contradicted by live data |
| (e) NYAD confirming | ✅ | -1,625 with deteriorating 5-day trend |
| (f) VIX aligned (rising for shorts) | ✅ | VIX 15.67, above yesterday's range, rising |
Confluence count: 5 of 6 confirmed (with the 6th partially met given Macro Agent staleness). This exceeds the 3+ threshold decisively.
Structural Risk Assessment:
The challenge with shorting here is that price is already 50+ pts below VWAP and 45+ pts below 60m EMAs, with RSI deeply oversold on 60m and 15m. Chasing into an oversold waterfall carries risk of a snapback. However:
- The Trend Agent regime is STRONG_TREND with recommendation "NORMAL" (not cautionary)
- The 5m consolidation at 7754-7762 provides a defined entry structure
- A break below the session low (7754.3) would be a clean continuation trigger
- The 7750 round number is the next congestion zone but not major S/R, the real next support is around 7740 (2x ATR band on 60m) and then 7720-7730 zone
Entry Strategy: Bear Flag Breakdown:
I'll use the consolidation as the setup structure. Entry on a break below the session low with the stop above the consolidation high. This avoids chasing and uses the defined range.
Stop placement check: Consolidation high is ~7767.6 (NY session candle high at 14:00 UTC). Trend Agent invalidation is 7799.2. A stop at 7768-7770 is well inside the invalidation level ✅. The stop is ~10-12 pts from entry, slightly tight for VIX 15.67, but the consolidation structure is clean and defined. Adding a 2pt buffer for slippage → stop at 7770.
R:R check:
- Entry: ~7753 (break of 7754.3 - buffer)
- Stop: 7770 (+2 pt buffer above consolidation high 7767.6)
- Risk: 17 pts
- TP1 at 1.0-1.25R: 7753 - 17 = 7736 (1.0R) to 7732 (1.25R)
- TP2 at 2.0R: 7753 - 34 = 7719
- Structure at TP1 zone: 7740 area aligns with 60m 2x ATR stop band, reasonable structural target
- Structure at TP2 zone: 7720 area, clean air below current price, would represent the full measured move of the bear flag (~7762 high - 7754 low = 8pt range, but the broader move is 7792 to 7754 = 38pt, projecting to ~7716)
R:R is 1.0R minimum at first structural level, 2.0R at full target ✅
Setup #1: US500 SHORT, Bear Flag Breakdown
- Direction: SHORT
- Entry Zone: 7751-7753 (on confirmed break below 7754.3 session low)
- Entry Trigger: 5-minute candle close below 7754 with increasing volume. Price must break and hold below 7754.3 (today's NY low), do not enter on a wick below that immediately reverses. A clean close below 7753 on the 5m confirms.
- Stop Loss: 7770 (2 pts above consolidation high of 7767.6; 17 pts risk; well below Trend Agent invalidation at 7799.2)
- Targets: TP1 = 7736 (1.0R, near 60m 2x ATR extension), TP2 = 7719 (2.0R, measured move projection)
- R-Multiples: TP1 = 1.0R, TP2 = 2.0R
- Quality Score: 7/10
- Confidence: Medium-High
Confluences (5/6):
- ✅ Multi-TF EMA alignment, bearish on 60m, 15m, 5m
- ✅ Price below VWAP on all timeframes (~47 pts below)
- ✅ Broken below yesterday's low (7787.5) and 3-day-ago close (7770.5)
- ✅ NYAD deeply negative at -1,625, confirming broad-based selling
- ✅ VIX rising (15.67, above yesterday's range), aligned for shorts
Risks:
- 60m RSI at 26.3 and 15m RSI at 23.2 = deeply oversold, snapback risk is real
- 7750 round number may act as temporary floor / congestion
- Macro Agent nominally still lean_bull (stale), when it updates, should flip but creates momentary uncertainty
- Already 50+ pts extended from VWAP, late in the move, not catching the initial impulse
- Volume on latest 5m candles declining (341 on last bar), consolidation may resolve up before breaking down
Trend Alignment: Fully aligned with Trend Agent (BEARISH, 78%, STRONG_TREND). Entry structure respects the trend continuation via bear flag breakdown. Stop below invalidation level.
Position Sizing Guidance: Given VIX expansion and the extended nature of the move, consider reducing standard risk to 0.75% of equity rather than full 1%. The setup has strong confluence but is late in the impulse, smaller size protects against the oversold snapback while maintaining exposure to continuation.
Why No Long Setup
A countertrend bounce trade was evaluated and rejected:
- 60m and 15m RSI are deeply oversold (26.3 / 23.2), which normally flags bounce potential
- However: zero confluences for longs: EMAs bearish on all timeframes, price far below VWAP, NYAD deeply negative, VIX rising, prior-day levels all broken
- The Trend Agent is BEARISH at 78% in a STRONG_TREND regime, countertrend trades in this regime carry low probability
- No bullish divergence detected on any timeframe
- Buying oversold in a strong trend is a strategy with a very low win rate
Verdict: No long setup qualifies.
Session Management Notes
- If price holds above 7754 and reclaims 7768 (consolidation high), the bear flag is invalidated, no entry and reassess for a potential failed breakdown / mean reversion back toward 7787 (yesterday's low, now resistance)
- If the breakdown triggers and reaches TP1, trail stop to breakeven on remaining position
- Monitor volume on the break, a high-volume breakdown with >900 ticks per 5m bar adds conviction; a low-volume break increases false breakdown risk
- 7750 round number will likely produce some chop, expect the move to stall briefly there before continuation
Decision log
14:38 UTC, 42 percent, WAIT. Price had entered the zone 14 seconds earlier. The forming 14:35 candle sat at 7,755.8, still above the 7,754.3 New York low, and the last three closes were between 7,757 and 7,760. Volume on the bar was 191 against an 843 average and 15-minute RSI was 22.4. The read called an entry "premature" and named the snapback risk off support.
14:39 UTC, 42 percent, WAIT. The forming candle had traded down to 7,752.6, inside the entry zone, but the read pointed out it was "still forming and hasn't closed yet." Volume at 548 against roughly 861 was, in its words, "the opposite of the 'increasing volume' requirement." It read the last three closes as consolidation holding above the trigger.
14:41 UTC, 45 percent, WAIT. Current price was 7,752.4, inside the zone. The 14:35 candle had closed at 7,755.0, above 7,754, on volume of 548 against 860. The read stated it directly: without a confirmed close below 7,754 and volume expansion, "the trigger is not yet satisfied."
14:42 UTC, 45 percent, WAIT. The forming candle was at 7,753.5 on volume of 173, too thin and too early to confirm anything. Both RSIs were deep in oversold territory and price was about 50 points under VWAP. The read listed the two things missing, a close below 7,753 and rising volume, and noted that neither had occurred.
14:45 UTC, 42 percent, WAIT. The prior candle had printed 7,750 and bounced, and the read had the last close just above the 7,754 threshold. Volume on the last three bars was 854, 866 and 719, falling. The read said that selling without a clean break and volume confirmation "would be chasing into exhaustion."
14:49 UTC, 42 percent, WAIT. Price was at 7,753, and the forming 14:45 candle was at 7,753.9, still above the confirmation level. The read noted the bounce off the 7,750 session low, volume of 508 against 865 and 15-minute RSI at 21.9, and judged an entry premature.
14:52 UTC, 62 percent, ENTER. The 14:45 candle had closed at 7,749.9, "below both the 7754 and 7753 confirmation levels required by the trigger," with price at 7,751. The read confirmed bearish alignment across timeframes and the Trend Agent at 78 percent in a strong trend. Then it listed what was missing: volume on the breakdown candle was 813 against an 880 average, and RSI was 28.9 on the 5-minute and 20.8 on the 15-minute. It called the trade tradeable but imperfect and entered. The order filled at 7,751.1 at 14:56 UTC.
On a $100k account at 2.0% risk per trade.
Each trade risks +$2,000 (1R). The system's actual scale-out behavior may differ, see disclaimer.
| Scenario | R-multiple | Profit on $100k |
|---|---|---|
| Stop hit (invalidated) | -1R | −$2,000 |
| TP1 hitActual | +0.8R | +$1,600 |
| TP2 hit | +1.7R | +$3,400 |
| TP3 hit (max potential) (not tracked) | +0R | +$0 |
All six agents combined.
What this trade teaches
A written trigger is only useful if the reads hold to its exact wording. This one asked for a close, and the six waits show what that cost in patience: price kept trading at or inside the 7,751-7,753 zone, and a system that sold on prints would have been short well before the plan's condition existed.
The second lesson is in the entry read. The trigger had two halves, a close below the level and rising volume. The close arrived and the volume did not, and the read said so in writing rather than rounding the second half up.
This is a tradeable but imperfect entry. SkyAnalyst entry evaluation, 14:52 UTC
The third lesson is about the ledger. The broker closed the position in full at TP1, so the ledger records +0.80R (TP1). The market's run to TP2 was +1.70R (TP2). The plan priced its targets at 1.0R and 2.0R from 7,753, and the fill at 7,751.1, the bottom of a short zone, shaved both. Our last S&P case study was about exactly that gap between a correct call and what it pays.
From the desk
The number we keep from Wednesday is +0.80R (TP1). The number on the hero panel is the market's, +1.70R (TP2). The part we care about is the fourteen minutes before the entry call, when the right direction and the right price were both on the screen and the plan's condition was not.
The agents also did not agree. The Trend Agent was bearish at 78 percent and the Macro Agent's latest read on the S&P was still lean bull. The plan named that disagreement, explained why it sided with the tape, and took a notch off its conviction for it. Our September 23 Dow short was another short taken while the Macro Agent's read leaned the other way.
At a Glance
What this teaches about AI-driven trading
What is the difference between a candle close and a wick through a level?
A wick is the part of a candle that traded beyond a level during the bar, while the close is the price where the bar finished. A wick below support shows sellers pushed through for a moment. A close below it shows they still held that ground when the bar ended. Many breakout traders only act on closes, because wicks that reverse are a common source of false breaks.
What is a bear flag in trading?
A bear flag is a continuation pattern that forms after a sharp drop. Price pauses in a tight sideways or slightly rising range while momentum cools, then breaks lower out of that range. Traders often place the stop just above the top of the flag and estimate a target by projecting the size of the prior drop from the breakout point. It describes a probability, not a certainty.
Why does volume matter when price breaks a level?
Volume shows how much trading took place on the move. A break on rising volume suggests many participants agreed with the new price, which makes the move more likely to hold. A break on falling or thin volume can mean the level gave way for lack of buyers rather than because of new selling, and those breaks are more likely to snap back toward the range.
How can an index be oversold and still keep falling?
Oversold readings such as an RSI under 30 measure how far and fast price has moved, not where it must turn. In a strong trend driven by news, such as a rate repricing after an inflation surprise, an index can stay oversold for hours while it keeps making lower lows. Traders treat oversold conditions as a risk to manage, often through tighter targets or smaller size, rather than as a reversal signal.
When does a fill price change a trade's R-multiples?
R-multiples are measured from the actual fill to the stop. If a plan prices its targets from one end of an entry zone and the order fills at the other, the distance to the stop and the distance to each target both change. For a short that fills near the bottom of its zone, the stop is farther away and the targets are closer, so each target is worth less in R.
Run your markets with SkyAnalyst
21-day free trial. No credit card. Full access to the Trend Agent, Macro Agent, and six-factor confluence scoring.
Trading involves substantial risk of loss. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The analysis shown was produced by an AI model operating on SkyAnalyst’s live trading infrastructure; it is shared for educational and research purposes only and is not financial advice. About reported results. Every AI Trader publishes three take-profit targets (TP1, TP2, TP3) per trade. The broker closes 100% of the position at TP1, so two distinct R-multiples appear in this article. The hero R-multiple is the full-potential R: where the market actually traveled (the highest take-profit hit, or the stop loss) before the setup was invalidated or exhausted. The realized R, shown on the TP1 row of the simulated returns panel, is TP1’s R (or -1R on a stop out). The realized R is what we log to our running track record. Both numbers are honest. Showing both is what lets readers see the full arc of the move and the conservative ledger entry it produced. Simulated returns in this article are calculated against a hypothetical $100,000 account at 2% risk per trade (1R = $2,000). These are educational reference figures and do not reflect any specific account or broker execution. Your actual result depends on your position size, your risk parameters, and live market conditions.
Past performance is not indicative of future results
The trades in this article are taken by the SkyAnalyst agents in live demo accounts at a regulated broker, in a live market environment, so the demo account reflects every transaction SkyAnalyst makes. The app logs each trade and confirms it against the live price feed of the broker; the capital is simulated and no real capital is at risk. The demo account is linked to MyFxbook, which publishes its results publicly. We publish these results to study how the agents trade and reason, for education and trade analysis, not as a recommendation. Trade at your own risk.
From the SkyAnalyst Journal
Six Stops in Three Days, and One Index Short Taken Three Times
Six losses at exactly 1R each, all before Thursday. Three were the same index short, filled across three books in eighteen minutes and stopped by one bounce.
Down 4.26R by Wednesday, Then Three Winners That Waited for the Candle
Eleven trades, -1.24R. Three Wednesday index shorts stopped together. From Thursday the desk entered only on closed trigger candles and won three straight.
Buy the Retrace, Not the Release: SkyAnalyst's Dow Long After the Data
Six minutes after the 10:00 ET data, the plan passed on buying strength and asked for a 50-61.8% retrace of the Dow's 149.5-point NY impulse. The broker booked +0.90R (TP1); the move ran to +2.18R (TP3).