Eleven trades, -1.24R. Three Wednesday index shorts stopped together. From Thursday the desk entered only on closed trigger candles and won three straight.
SkyAnalyst is not one AI trader. It is four specialist agents, each with its own data pipeline, each maintaining state between evaluations, and each required to agree before a position is sized. They don’t chat in prose. They write structured messages to a shared state object that each reads on every evaluation cycle.
The week was decided by when the desk pulled the trigger, not by which way it leaned. The directional read was mostly right from Monday to Friday: a firm dollar, firm yields and, on Wednesday, breadth that fell to -1,684 ahead of the FOMC minutes. But six of the first eight trades lost, and at 15:37 UTC on Wednesday, after three index shorts filled within eighteen minutes of each other and all three stopped, the window stood at -4.26R. From there the desk won three in a row: a Nasdaq short on Thursday that ran to its third target, a Dow long on Friday that did the same, and a Friday euro short that entered on a closed rejection candle after six evaluations had declined it. The window closed at -1.24R across eleven trades, about 2,480 dollars down on a simulated 100,000 dollar account at 2% risk. The year to date ledger reads +38.35R YTD through Sep 30, 2026, from Jan 12 inception, sealed at the September close, which puts the same simulated account at $176,703.28. This whole week belongs to October, which is still open and not yet part of that figure.
Monday opened with the dollar breaking out. DXY was at 102.327, above the prior day's high, the 10-year yield was at 5.309%, and the Macro Agent read the euro strong_bear at 78%. The Dow short book sold US30 at 51,099.2 at 14:14 UTC on its fourth evaluation, after two declines that both said the 5-minute rejection had not closed. The approval said the same thing: a workable signal "even if the current 5m rejection candle is not fully closed yet." Price went 55 points our way and came back through the stop at 51,209.4 ninety-eight minutes later.
The euro short at 1.11942 seventeen minutes later did everything its plan asked. The 5-minute candle wicked into the zone and closed at 1.11927, under the 1.11940 trigger. It never got more than three pips into profit and was stopped late in the day. The Cable short at 1.3219 at 15:24 reached its first target at 1.3206 and banked +0.72R. Tuesday brought one trade, a Nasdaq long at 31,338.1 with the index at all-time highs. The approval noted that the 5-minute MACD histogram was negative and worsening and that price had not convincingly reclaimed 31,345. It saw 31,346.3 and stopped thirty-five minutes after the fill.
Wednesday began well. The Cable book declined its short while price sat under the 1.32130-1.32155 zone and the entry would have been a chase. It approved once a completed 5-minute candle closed at 1.32079 under the trigger, filled at 1.32134 at 14:51 UTC as price rallied back, and ran through its second target at 1.31905. That trade put the week at -1.26R.
Then the index books went short together into a bounce. The Nasdaq short filled at 31,054.3 at 15:19 UTC, eighty-three seconds after an evaluation that declined it because price was pushing up into the zone rather than rejecting from it. The S&P short filled at 7,785 at 15:37, seventy-nine seconds after a decline that said the rejection candle had not formed. The Dow short filled at 51,054.7 twenty-three seconds after its plan was written, on a candle its own approval called valid but not perfect. Breadth was at -1,684, the 60-minute RSI on the Nasdaq was 26, and the FOMC minutes were due that afternoon. All three stopped, the Dow in nineteen minutes, and the week reached its low at -4.26R.
On Thursday the Nasdaq short plan asked for a 5-minute close below 30,992. The 15:30 UTC candle closed at 30,982.8, the trade was approved on its first evaluation, and it filled at 30,996.3. It ran through all three targets to 30,726 by 17:01. Oil at 105.88 and yields holding above their 5-day average kept the macro read bearish.
Friday followed a soft UoM sentiment print of 46.3 against 47.5 with inflation expectations at 4.7%. The Dow long book bought US30 at 51,365 after a completed candle swept the retracement pocket and closed back at 51,356.6, and it reached its third target at 51,546 at 16:03. The euro short book declined six times in eight minutes because price had not pulled back into 1.1200-1.1205 with a rejection. When the 14:35 candle tested 1.12005 and closed at 1.11988, it approved, filled at 1.12001 at 14:46, and reached its first target at 1.1190. At +1.28R it is the win of the week, and it took the window from -2.52R to -1.24R.
| Date | Time | Instrument | Dir | Model | Setup | Grade | R | $ Sim | Result | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5 | 14:14 UTC | US30 | Short | US30 SHORT retracement failure | C+ | -1.0R(SL) | -$2,000(SL) | Stop hit | - | |
| Oct 5 | 14:31 UTC | EURUSD | Short | EURUSD Short Sell on Retrace | B | -1.0R(SL) | -$2,000(SL) | Stop hit | - | |
| Oct 5 | 15:24 UTC | GBPUSD | Short | GBPUSD NY AM conditional short on rejection | C+ | +0.72R(TP1) | +$1,444(TP1) | TP1 hit | Read case → | |
| Oct 6 | 15:55 UTC | NAS100 | Long | Claude Opus 4.7 | NAS100 LONG, Pullback Buy on Trend Continuation | C+ | -1.0R(SL) | -$2,000(SL) | Stop hit | - |
| Oct 7 | 14:51 UTC | GBPUSD | Short | GBPUSD Short - Rally Sell Continuation | B | +1.02R(TP1) | +$2,034(TP1) | TP2 hit | Read case → | |
| Oct 7 | 15:19 UTC | NAS100 | Short | NAS100 SHORT, VWAP Rejection / Failed Rally into Resistance | C+ | -1.0R(SL) | -$2,000(SL) | Stop hit | - | |
| Oct 7 | 15:37 UTC | US500 | Short | US500 SHORT, Bearish Trend Continuation at Yesterday's Low Rejection | C+ | -1.0R(SL) | -$2,000(SL) | Stop hit | - | |
| Oct 7 | 15:37 UTC | US30 | Short | US30 sell-the-bounce pullback fade | C+ | -1.0R(SL) | -$2,000(SL) | Stop hit | - | |
| Oct 8 | 15:50 UTC | NAS100 | Short | NASDAQ100 SHORT, VWAP Rejection / Bear Flag Breakdown | C+ | +0.84R(TP1) | +$1,671(TP1) | TP3 hit | Read case → | |
| Oct 9 | 14:33 UTC | US30 | Long | GPT-5.5 | US30 LONG, post-data retracement / reclaim | C+ | +0.90R(TP1) | +$1,807(TP1) | TP3 hit | Read case → |
| Oct 9 | 14:46 UTC | EURUSD | Short | EURUSD SHORT (Trend Continuation Pullback) | C+ | +1.28R(TP1) | +$2,557(TP1) | TP1 hit · ★ Trade of the week | - |
Dollar figures are simulated on a $100,000 account at 2% risk per trade. Actual subscriber P&L varies with account size. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.
The pattern this week was the same one we named last week, at a larger size. The trades that waited for a closed trigger candle paid. The trades that entered on a candle still forming mostly did not.
Four of the six losses were approved with notes that said, in writing, the trigger was not complete. The Monday Dow short entered while its rejection candle was still open. The Tuesday Nasdaq long entered with the 5-minute MACD histogram worsening and the reclaim of 31,345 unconfirmed. The Wednesday Nasdaq and S&P shorts were each approved within ninety seconds of a decline, with no new closed candle in between. A fifth loss, the Wednesday Dow short, met only the minimum version of its trigger, at the lower edge of its zone.
The sixth loss is the one that breaks the pattern, and it matters. The Monday euro short met its trigger in full and still stopped. A closed candle does not make a trade a winner. It makes it the trade the plan described.
The winners are not perfectly clean either. Monday's Cable short was approved with its trigger candle closing at 1.32194, less than half a pip above the 1.32190 level, and it paid. One near miss that worked is not evidence against the rule, but we would rather say so than leave it out.
Between 15:19 and 15:37 UTC on Wednesday the Nasdaq, S&P and Dow books all went short, and all three stopped for a combined -3R. Each book read its own tape and each read was bearish, but they were reading the same broad selloff, and the same 60-minute oversold bounce took out all three. Three books agreeing on one market move is one bet, not three.
The Friday euro short is the decision of the week. Six evaluations declined it in eight minutes because price either sat under the 1.1200-1.1205 zone or had not printed a rejection inside it. It approved only once the 14:35 candle tested 1.12005 and closed at 1.11988, and it reached its first target at 1.1190 for +1.28R.
The Wednesday S&P short is the decision we would take back. At 15:35 UTC the evaluation declined it because price had not rallied into the 7,781-7,785 pocket to form a rejection, and at 15:37 the approval said the rejection candle had still not formed. The fill came at 7,785, the trade never went a point our way, and it stopped at 7,797.1 forty-five minutes later.
A Monday short that met its trigger in full and stopped, then the Friday short that waited through six declines for a closed rejection at 1.12005 and became the win of the week.
All EURUSD this week →Two shorts selling relief rallies into resistance after London had already broken down, two first targets, and the best book of the window.
All GBPUSD this week →A Monday short approved before its rejection candle closed, a Wednesday short filled twenty-three seconds after its plan was written, and a Friday post-data long that ran to its third target.
All US30 this week →A Tuesday long at all-time highs and a Wednesday short into a bounce both stopped. Thursday's short entered on a closed candle below 30,992 and ran through all three targets.
All NAS100 this week →No trades this week. The yen book did not produce a qualifying setup.
All USDJPY this week →One Wednesday short approved seventy-nine seconds after a decline, never moved in our favor, and stopped at 7,797.1.
All US500 this week →No trades this week. USDCAD remains the newest book and it has not yet produced a qualifying setup.
All USDCAD this week →Win of the week: EURUSD Short · +1.28R
The highest-grade loss of the week was Monday's euro short, and it is the one we would take again. The plan asked for a 5-minute close under 1.11940 after a touch of the zone, the candle closed at 1.11927, and the macro read was as strong as it gets. It stopped anyway. That is a 1R cost of trading, not a mistake.
Wednesday is different. Three index shorts filled between 15:19 and 15:37 UTC into the same bounce: Nasdaq at 31,054.3, S&P at 7,785 and the Dow at 51,054.7. The Nasdaq and S&P approvals each came within ninety seconds of an evaluation that had declined the trade, and both approvals stated that the trigger was not yet confirmed. The Dow approval came twenty-three seconds after its plan was written. Breadth at -1,684 made the direction look obvious, and the 60-minute RSI at 26 on the Nasdaq said the obvious move had already run.
None of the three got more than about 34 points into profit. Together they took the week from -1.26R to -4.26R, and they are the reason a week with three straight winners at the end still closed negative.
Each trade risks +$2,000 (1R). The system's actual scale-out behavior may differ, see disclaimer.
| Scenario | R-multiple | Profit on $100k |
|---|---|---|
| Window netActual | -1.24R | −$2,480 |
The week lost 1.24R, about 2,480 dollars on the simulated 100,000 dollar account at 2% risk. Six losses at exactly 1R each and five winners, and a window that was down 4.26R on Wednesday afternoon finished a little over a single loss down.
The year to date ledger reads +38.35R across 257 trades at a 57.59% win rate from Jan 12 inception, sealed at the September close. Run through a static 100,000 dollar account at 2% risk, that is $176,703.28. Run through the same account compounding, where each trade is sized off the balance it actually had, it is $203,855.48. The gap, a little over 27,000 dollars, is not extra edge. It is the same R banked through fixed fractional sizing, and it is also why a week like this one does limited damage: every loss is sized to 2% of the balance at the time, so a -4.26R hole costs a fixed, known fraction of the account rather than a growing one.
One piece of housekeeping on the numbers. October is still open, so this week is not in the year to date figure. The ledger has -3.37R recorded for the month so far across 15 trades, and it joins the year to date number when the month closes.
Next week each book reads its session from scratch. The direction was mostly right this week, including on several of the losses. The work is in the approval: the candle the plan asked for, closed, before the order goes in.
Last week we wrote that we were looking at making the candle-close conditions in a session plan binding at the approval step, and at approvals that follow a decline with no new closed candle in between. This week produced two more of the second kind on the same morning, and four losses approved with notes that said the trigger was incomplete. The case for both changes is now stronger than it was seven days ago.
We are also looking at correlated exposure across the index books. The Nasdaq, S&P and Dow plans are written separately and each reads its own tape, but on Wednesday they took the same short inside eighteen minutes. A check that notices when the third index book is about to enter the same direction within minutes of the other two is a question worth asking before the entry, not after the stops.
Because a trade only counts as a win once it reaches its first target, and none of the six losses did. Four of them were approved before the trigger the plan asked for had fully printed, and they were stopped on the pullbacks the trigger was meant to filter out. Being right about the day is not the same as being right about the entry.
Because October is still open. The year to date ledger is sealed at the end of each completed month, so it reads +38.35R across 257 trades through Sep 30, 2026. October currently sits at -3.37R in the ledger across 15 trades, and it joins the year to date figure when the month closes. We publish it this way so a number printed in one month still means the same thing later in the year.
Each index book writes its own plan and reads its own tape, and on Wednesday morning all three tapes read bearish: breadth at -1,684, yields at a 5-day high and the FOMC minutes ahead. That made it one market view expressed three times. All three stopped on the same bounce, and correlated exposure across the index books is one of the things we are now looking at.
This recap uses a TP1 baseline: a winner is credited with the distance to its first target and a loser with exactly minus 1R. The single-trade case studies report full potential, the distance to the furthest target price actually reached. The Thursday Nasdaq short and the Friday Dow long both reached their third targets, so their case studies show larger numbers than the ones in this table. Both are honest, they measure different things, and we never mix them inside one article.
No. Monday's euro short met its trigger in full, had the strongest macro read of the week behind it, and stopped. That is the cost of trading a probabilistic edge, and it is what the 2% risk per trade is sized for. The losses we want to remove are the ones the plan itself said were not ready.
Subscribers receive the same pre-trade AI analysis three minutes before entry.
We project the recap totals using a TP1 exit on every winning trade. This is the simplest baseline for comparing across periods. Traders running their own scale-out, trail, or TP2/TP3 hold strategies will see different totals. Dollar figures are simulated on a $100,000 account at 2% risk per trade. Actual subscriber P&L varies with account size and execution. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.
The trades in this article are taken by the SkyAnalyst agents in live demo accounts at a regulated broker, in a live market environment, so the demo account reflects every transaction SkyAnalyst makes. The app logs each trade and confirms it against the live price feed of the broker; the capital is simulated and no real capital is at risk. The demo account is linked to MyFxbook, which publishes its results publicly. We publish these results to study how the agents trade and reason, for education and trade analysis, not as a recommendation. Trade at your own risk.
Six losses at exactly 1R each, all before Thursday. Three were the same index short, filled across three books in eighteen minutes and stopped by one bounce.

Six minutes after the 10:00 ET data, the plan passed on buying strength and asked for a 50-61.8% retrace of the Dow's 149.5-point NY impulse. The broker booked +0.90R (TP1); the move ran to +2.18R (TP3).

Two reads at 88 and 85 percent said no: price had already left the 1.32130-1.32155 sell zone. The short filled back inside it at 1.32134, and TP1 printed overnight for +1.02R (TP1).